You’ve gotta fight for your right to get an education
Friday, January 8, 2010 Leave a comment
Originally published October 29, 2009.
We’ve spent months fighting over facets of the college experience, from the clout scandal to Illinois’s MAP grant funding to the DREAM Act. At the heart of all of these issues lies a single question: do we have a right to a college education?
We’ve spent months fighting over facets of the college experience, from the clout scandal to Illinois’s MAP grant funding to the DREAM Act. At the heart of all of these issues lies a single question: do we have a right to a college education?
When I use the word “right,” I mean a choice that everyone has access to, in which their individual merit is the only factor that determines their attendance at a particular university. Two of the greatest impediments to this, as we’ve seen over the course of the summer through this fall, are political influence and money.
Since the clout scandal broke months ago, apathetic onlookers seem to express the same complaint.
Whether in regard to people’s obsession with forcing trustees to take the blame or to the sense of futility that things could ever change, they respond with the point that many schools have clout lists.
While forcing a good chunk of the Board of Trustees to resign, including Joe White and Richard Herman, may relieve a little of our immediate frustration, the problem won’t be corrected until we demand that the state legislators involved pay the price for essentially starting everything.
If we truly believe in working toward fairness in higher education—that is, insisting that dedicated minds have a right to attend college based on that academic dedication alone—then we need to step up our response and set the example for other public institutions governed by unfair political influence.
The bigger obstacle (one further aggravated by state government in Illinois) is money, as we’ve seen in the recent fight to re-establish funding for Illinois’s MAP grants. Public response to the under-funding of the program over the summer finally pushed Governor Quinn to allot another $205 million for grants two weeks ago. As the state takes out a loan to pay for the expense, people are voicing their concerns about how we’ll manage to pay it back.
Anyone attending college in the last several years has likely noticed a continuous increase in tuition rates, brought on in part by legislative efforts to keep costs down for students. To compensate for flat-lining funding from other sources (in our case, state government), universities jack up their prices, increasing the need for grant and scholarship funding.
Ice that expensive cake with the skyrocketing cost of textbooks and you’ve got a dessert so pricey that many in even the upper middle-class have a hard time footing the bill, to say nothing of the impact it has on lower-income students’ college prospects.
It’s impossible not to recognize that race and ethnicity are tied into this battle against college cost. While certainly not all prospective lower-income students identify as racial or ethnic minorities or vice-versa, the exorbitant price of attending a university plays a serious role in determining the make-up of a college population. Increasing costs and dwindling financial aid resources make college a privilege, not a right.
In some circumstances, the U.S. outright denies people a chance to attend—people who, though technically undocumented, have lived here most of their lives.
This is the problem the DREAM Act aims to correct by providing conditional residency to those who qualify. But if it’s not one thing, it’s another: even if the legislation passes, these students would be ineligible for federal aid.
Greater social, historical, and cultural factors have established much of America’s financial landscape, and it would be naïve to say that making college truly affordable for all would be a simple solution to enact—or that it is a solution able to level out the inequalities created by those factors. But the issues we’ve faced as of late can and must be opportunities to make headway in the struggle to refocus the college experience from a discriminatory business to a truly higher, broader, and better education.
Chelsea is a senior in LAS.